- Wrongful DeathClient: German roofing manufacturer (co-counsel with Cleveland law firm). Lead counsel in defense of claims for wrongful death and personal injuries to workers applying single-ply roofing membrane which allegedly gave off toxic fumes during the application process. Case settled following extensive depositions in Germany.
- Theft
- AntitrustClient: Major pharmaceutical manufacturer (co-counsel with California law firm). Served as local counsel over many years in federal multi-district antitrust litigation in the Southern District of Florida, brought by direct and indirect purchasers of pharmaceutical products based on allegedly unlawful agreement to delay sale of generic versions of the product. All major class claims resolved by settlement.
- Wrongful TerminationClient: German reinsurers (co-counsel with New York law firm). Obtained summary judgment in federal court in favor of reinsurers, in action claiming tens of millions of dollars allegedly suffered by Florida affiliate of multi-national insurance group, based on defamation, wrongful termination, and conspiracy claims.
- Employment DiscriminationClient: Fortune 100 company. Obtained dismissal at the close of plaintiff’s case in federal court jury trial, in an action by its terminated Miami division chief executive based on alleged violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Later oversaw the successful defense of a sexual harassment case against the same company, in which summary judgment was obtained in federal court and affirmed on appeal, following a rehearing en banc in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
- Sexual HarassmentClient: Automobile dealership. Jury trial of federal court sexual harassment suit against local automobile dealership, followed by favorable settlement following verdict awarding nominal compensatory damages.
- Real Estate LitigationClient: Major Chicago-based real estate investment and development firm. Successfully tried two cases involving claims in South Florida, one for alleged breach of contract in connection with the purchase and sale of a shopping center, the other a dispute with regard to a condominium project. Three-week jury trial in the former resulted in a verdict well below previous settlement offers; not guilty federal court jury verdict in the latter.
- Bankruptcy